DESTINY

[WeaponTheory]

(06-22-2015, 08:45 PM)CNS Wrote: I'm miffed that people are upset about the $40 price tag. As it is, I understand the anger of the pricing of the various editions of The Taken King, but DeeJ is going to address it in the weekly update, stating that Day 1 players will get something better overall. We have to go into "wait and see" mode, so all of this jumping to conclusions nonsense needs to stop.

There's various reasons why people are upset about the DLC.
But none of them are logical.

"I'm a day one player, I'm not getting anything, waaaah".

>implying they will give you anything that will matter in-game, in terms of gameplay.

The late as fuck Christmas gift Bungie gave us was a purple engram that gave us weapons we mostly dismantle.
And the House of Wolves DLC has proved that people are still using their old weapons.

What could they possibly offer?

"Here's a Shader. Hope you got space in your Inventory. And btw, it's just a contrast different from something you already bought from Eris or Eva. Enjoy!"

Emblem? I never kept the same Emblem on for more than a week.

I don't get it. The $40 version of the DLC DOES come with something for the year one players. Why are people butthurt again?


From the Eurogamer shitstorm.

"Waaaaah, I can't get dance emotes unless I pay an extra $40."

Shut the fuck up.


I'm upset about the DLC because of the Sub-Classes, y'know, something that actually matters in-game? is bundled with a Story DLC I don't care for. THAT'S what everyone SHOULD be pissed about. None of this cosmetic bullshit.

The Destiny community is pissed at what Luke Smith said in the Eurogamer interview. But they're too stupid to realize that what Luke said is EXACTLY what Activision is thinking of it's Destiny consumers. They should be mad at Activision, not Luke.